Welcome    |    Product    |    Comparison     |    Team    |    Contact  

Affiliates

 

Location Technologies Compared

SafeLink

GPS Cellular
RFID
WiFi
Description Self-contained module concealed on person, or chipset embedded in object. Reports location upon remote request. GPS-equipped devices: e.g.: cell phones.  When user dials 911 his location is sent to the emergency call center. Same as GPS except that the cell phone calculates its location by triangulating three cell towers. ID tag attached to an object is activated by strong radio field, then sends a message to a nearby reader. WiFi access points transmit an ID.  Some are informally logged by volunteers with approximate location.
Nominal
Accuracy
3 to 10m indoors and outdoors in both horizontal and vertical planes 3 to 10m outdoors horizontal plane, 50m or poorer vertical plane 10m to 5km outdoors in horizontal plane, poorer in vertical Typical 1 to 5m in very small areas both indoors and outdoors Typical 30m in small areas both indoors and outdoors
Location Reference Locator computes its location using existing local commercial broadcast signals as beacons. Cell phone computes its location if it can receive GPS signal. Cell phone computes its location if it can receive signals from three cellular towers. Reader location is considered the tag's location.  Triangulation also possible with multiple readers. Only approximate access point proximity sensing is possible.
Operator Interface Authorized person requests location remotely online or via telephone. User must initiate a call for help to public emergency call center. User must initiate a call for help to public emergency call center. Tag must be carried close to a reader. None. WiFi is unmanaged and ad hoc.
Coverage Coverage indoors and out throughout metropolitan areas served by broadcast signals. Only locations with both GPS and cellular coverage.  Poor or no service indoors. Only locations with multi-site cellular service.  Limited service/poor accuracy indoors. Immediate proximity to the reader. Immediate proximity to the WiFi access point.
Service
Area
Metropolitan areas in most countries. Areas with both GPS and suitable cellular service. Areas with service from multiple cell towers. Typically several foot radius from the reader. Typically 30-50 meters from access point.
Security Broadcasts resist jamming.  No single-point vulnerabilities. Easily spoofed or jammed. Vulnerable to disruption. Easily spoofed or jammed. Vulnerable to disruption. Can be spoofed or jammed. Vulnerable to disruption. Unlikely to be spoofed or jammed, but easily disrupted.
Ease of
Use
No user interaction required, making it ideal for small children and infirm adults. Cell phones are too complex for many children and disabled persons to use. Cell phones are too complex for many children and disabled persons to use. Reader infrastructure is complex to set up.  Major investment. No setup needed. Access points are unmanaged and poorly documented.
Operating Cost Free broadcast signal infrastructure. Free GPS, costly cellular. Free GPS, costly cellular. Costly infrastructure, custom build-out. Free but undependable WiFi.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Just how powerful IS SafeLink?

Signal Power Levels Compared.*

 

SafeLink
(VHF)
~30 miles

Cellular
(900 MHz)

~4 miles

GPS
(1.6 GHz)

~11,000 miles

Effective Radiated Power +45 dBW +10 dBW +30 dBW
Path Loss Unobstructed 106 dB 108 dB 183 dB
Received Signal Power -61 dBW -98 dBW -153 dBW
SafeLink is Stronger by:   37 dB
(5,000 times)
92 dB
(2 billion times)

*SafeLink's signal power and robust frequency reach indoors like no other positioning technology.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

A More Reliable Wireless Positioning Solution

Location-Based Services (LBS) are in their infancy.  Initially they used GPS because it was available at the time.  However, GPS will not ultimately succeed in the LBS market because it does not work in places where most people spend their time on a daily basis - indoors and in dense urban environments.

According to research, people in developed countries on average spend over 50 percent of their time in urban areas (cities) or indoors (office buildings, homes, schools, malls).

GPS services work poorly or not at all indoors.  Errors of hundreds of meters horizontally, and even larger errors vertically, are common due to weak satellite signals that are attenuated and reflected by buildings and walls.

Given these inherent drawbacks of GPS, LBS manufacturers have experimented with hybrid solutions in which GPS is augmented by cellular, WiFi access point (AP), and U-TDOA signals. 

But these additional signals bring their own sets of problems.   Cellular triangulation is frustrated by small cell sizes and poor signal penetration.  WiFi AP service radius is tiny.  Many APs are unknown; relatively few are accurately logged.  Unlicensed, undocumented, and movable APs cause serious AP database errors.  A disorganized infrastructure such as this is unacceptable for LBS and Public Safety uses.  Further, achievable measurement accuracy with WiFi is poor: volunteers log AP locations casually at best, and location measurement is performed using coarse proximity sensing.  U-TDOA augmentation also is inherently inaccurate, and in addition may require costly cellular network hardware upgrades.

These hybrid designs essentially are an attempt to improve GPS accuracy through use of additional location information obtained from other signal sources.  Unfortunately, hybrid designs are fragile since they are only as strong as the weakest link; all elements of a hybrid design must work in order to improve upon raw GPS accuracy.  And, of course, hybrid designs are still dependent upon reception of at least some GPS satellite signals which, as stated previously, can be a significant challenge indoors.  Even under clear-sky outdoor reception conditions, GPS receivers typically operate with only a very small 5-8 dB signal margin.

In addition to its indoor and urban service limitations, GPS is known to be vulnerable to spoofing, jamming and service disruptions.  Cellular service is also considered vulnerable to disruption from natural disasters and terrorist-type attacks directed against its single-point failure weaknesses.  For these and other reasons, the United States government considers GPS and cellular networks to be secondary, rather than primary, systems for use under emergency conditions.

SafeLink is a far simpler and far more robust solution to the challenges of accurate urban and indoor location measurement.  It is based on use of the strongest signals in existence anywhere in the world - commercial broadcasts.  Broadcast signals are known to penetrate dense concrete buildings and urban canyons in population centers worldwide, providing unequalled coverage virtually everywhere throughout the populated world.  And with no single-point failures like those of GPS and cellular networks, SafeLink can be counted on to deliver critical LBS and Public Safety services when they are needed.

counter for tumblr

 


Copyright © SafeLink, Inc. 2006-2010
All rights reserved.

[back]